On Fri, 13 Apr 2018, Ørjan Johansen wrote:
On Thu, 12 Apr 2018, Edward Murphy wrote:
Also, has anyone noticed the extra 'not' in Gaelan's signature? I
suspect it's intentional sneakiness.
I'd use Hanlon's razor here, it's the kind of logic many people mess up and
it seems a bit too indiscriminately destructive to be sneakiness.
No wait, it *is* correct. Yep people mess this up all right. We're talking
about this text right?
{{{
I object to all intentions that do not satisfy all of these criteria:
- The intention was sent to agora-business, or agora-official if it is
related to an office held by the player making the intention.
- The intention was not sent in a way designed to prevent people from
noticing its existence.
}}}
I'm actually a bit worried about the office part though - it's not too
implausible for a player to innocently include an intent that's not
strictly related to an office.
Greetings,
Ørjan.
