On Thu, 12 Apr 2018, Corona wrote:
I withdraw my and Quazie's (acting on eir behalf) support for the
destruction of "Hi" - let's just have the vote on that proposal, and
possibly destroy the contract later, if the proposal fails.
It seems possible to read the combination of rule 2519 and rule 2124 to
imply you cannot support on someone's behalf.
Rule 2519/0 (Power=3.0)
Consent
A person gives consent (syn. consents) to an action when e, acting
as emself, publicly states that e agrees to the action. This
agreement may be implied, but only if it is reasonably clear from
context that the person wanted the agreement to take place.
Rule 2124/22 (Power=2.0)
Agoran Satisfaction
A Supporter of a dependent action is an eligible entity who has
publicly posted (and not withdrawn) support (syn. "consent") for
an announcement of intent to perform the action. An Objector to a
dependent action is an eligible entity who has publicly posted
(and not withdrawn) an objection to the announcement of intent to
perform the action.
[...]
Greetings,
Ørjan.
