If you’re right about newer bids overwriting older ones, we should be fine.
Gaelan > On Feb 15, 2018, at 10:14 AM, Kerim Aydin <ke...@u.washington.edu> wrote: > > > > Ah - entirely forgot about that. Well hopefully my insertion didn't make > things worse then. > > >> On Thu, 15 Feb 2018, Gaelan Steele wrote: >> I resolve my intent to ratify without objection. CB’s and my >> non-real-integer bids should no longer exist. >> >> Gaelan >> >>> On Feb 15, 2018, at 9:54 AM, Kerim Aydin <ke...@u.washington.edu> wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> The following bids are defensive. If the auction works as is sensible >>> these simply >>> result in 12-shiny bids in each auction. If the auction is already screwed >>> up, >>> these bids offer some defense. If it screws things up badly beyond what's >>> been done >>> already I'll card myself. Details later. >>> >>> >>>> I put the Zombie Quazie up for auction (i.e. I initiate this auction). >>> I bid a number of shinies equal to the cardinality of the continuum for >>> Quazie. >>> I bid 30 shinies for Quazie. >>> I bid 12 shinies for Quazie. >>> >>> >>>> I put the Zombie nichdel up for auction (i.e. I initiate this auction). >>> I bid a number of shinies equal to the cardinality of the continuum for >>> nichdel. >>> I bid 30 shinies for nichdel. >>> I bid 12 shinies for nichdel. >>> >>> >>>> I put the Zombie omd up for auction (i.e. I initiate this auction). >>> I bid a number of shinies equal to the cardinality of the continuum for omd. >>> I bid 30 shinies for omd. >>> I bid 12 shinies for omd. >>> >>> >>> >> >>
