Not to bring them up again but I think it would be easier if G. themselves
just admit that their own card was ineffective to clear it out, so no need
for back and forth.

On Fri, Feb 9, 2018 at 1:42 AM, Madeline <[email protected]> wrote:

> Isn't the implication there that you should appeal it if you're not happy
> with it?
>
>
>
> On 2018-02-09 11:38, Cuddle Beam wrote:
>
>> I'll retract my bids if G. cards themselves for pulling this:
>>
>>      Trivial auction breaking spoils everyone's fun.  Really.  And "I
>>> might
>>>      as well" directly break a rule is a terrible attitude to bring to
>>> the
>>>      game, and doesn't Treat Agora Right.  This deserves a strong
>>> penalty.
>>> You were testing, I was testing... Citing the rule specifically such that
>>> a ruling on whether it was appropriate would be specific to cause, and
>>> choosing a card to make it worth contesting.
>>>
>> I hope to believe in the future that cardings/fingerpointings from G. are
>> for legitimate game health reasons and not for taunting people to further
>> personal agendas (as interesting as the points sought may be).
>>
>> On Fri, Feb 9, 2018 at 1:34 AM, Gaelan Steele <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> Still leaves my bid of i. I’m kind of curious about the ruling about that,
>>> but I’m happy to (attempt to) retract one or both of my bids if that’s
>>> what
>>> everyone would prefer.
>>>
>>> Gaelan
>>>
>>> On Feb 8, 2018, at 4:20 PM, Kerim Aydin <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, 9 Feb 2018, Madeline wrote:
>>>>> So what's the status on the remaining two auctions now?
>>>>> I was hoping to make a serious bid on them. :(
>>>>>
>>>> Here's how fun's not *entirely* broken:
>>>>
>>>> You can still place lower bids.
>>>>
>>>> And CuddleBeam *might* be able to retract eir bid (I think e
>>>> can, because that doesn't outright conflict with the zombie
>>>> auction rule).
>>>>
>>>> Players may wish to think about making support for Throwing
>>>> the Book at CuddleBeam somehow conditional on whether e withdraws
>>>> those bids...
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>

Reply via email to