(Looking for odd misunderstandings of how rules function - entries encouraged)
Assertion If a person holds two offices each with a weekly report, then e has the single duty of producing one weekly report combining both offices (though it can be produced in parts). Arguments Seems like a straightforward reading of r2143 that defined weekly duties as a per-person set. I think the main consequence is how cards are awarded (i.e. even if two reports are missed, it's only one card). Later in the rule, it discusses the concept of Office-based reports, but doesn't associate those with punishments (only the per-person ones).
