Nowhere was it stated that this is a CFJ.
On 11/29/2017 12:47 AM, Owen Jacobson wrote:
On Nov 28, 2017, at 11:51 PM, VJ Rada <[email protected]> wrote:
Cards issued for reasons that don't break the rules or cards that are
obviously inappropriate are INNEFFECTIVE. The Dive rule which Alexis
used says "Notwithstanding rule 2426, the reason for the card
MAY be any grievance held by the Prime Minister, not necessarily a
violation of the rules, against the person to whom the Card is
issued."
That's a MAY not a CAN. So the card was ineffective because it is
obviously and facially inappropriate to issue a black card to a
player. This is the definitive answer, all other answers are wrong.
I favour this CFJ.
-o
