> On Nov 28, 2017, at 10:00 PM, Alex Smith <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Tue, 2017-11-28 at 21:57 -0500, Owen Jacobson wrote: >>> On Nov 28, 2017, at 4:53 PM, VJ Rada <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> (If I can take actions) >>> >>> I destroy 10 bills, get 1 shinies, and use it to create a contract >>> with the following text {This sentence is false. If the previous >>> sentence is false, V.J. Rada SHALL give Agora 1 billion shinies >>> within >>> a month if e is a player} >> >> Fun fact: the current contract rules neither specify that contracts >> have names nor require that contracts be given names. The convention >> of naming contracts is purely informal. >> >> However, for reporting purposes, this contract will be identified as >> V.J Rada’s Paradox. It’s unclear whether it exists, but I need to be >> able to talk about it in reports until its existence is resolved. > > Traditionally, otherwise anonymous contracts were named after the date > they were created and person who created them, e.g. > "(2017-11-29 ais523)”.
That seems like a much more reasonable system than trying to invent meaningful names. -o
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
