On Tue, 28 Nov 2017 at 20:16 Ørjan Johansen <oer...@nvg.ntnu.no> wrote:
> On Tue, 28 Nov 2017, Alexis Hunt wrote: > > > This is intentional, as far as I'm aware. > > If by "this" you mean that supporters are allowed to be performers, I know > that, but my claim is that this is actually broken due to the phrasing of > the rule. See also my proto message. > > Greetings, > Ørjan. > I mean that supporters are not allowed to perform actions restricted to specific players. For example, only the correct officer can resolve an officer-only intent. I'm pretty sure it still works if it's generally "any player CAN with 2 support".
