Correct, it's not a report per precedent (grossly negligent and not useful enough to be a report). I can't, therefore, claim a reward for it.
I did work on referee quite genuinely (which is why I was sad to lose it) and I never scammed w/ any previous offices (the most recent one was a spur-of-the-moment idea and I even attempted to award myself 3,000 cards to punish me for it, and will be carded for pledge-breaking), but yes, I take your point entirely (and personally don't mind the swearing). The deputisation was because I have a large quantity of balloons, the election will soon be completed, and that seemed like a good opportunity to use the hard-to-use resource for personal gain where usually little can be found. I agree, though, that perhaps I shouldn't have done it. I tend to act and speak very fast, which is fine on an internet forum in which discussion happens, but not fine in a place where speech is also technically actions. Despite the horrific disgrace of a report I attempted to file, Herald is not that hard of a position recordkeeping. Obviously I made a mess of recordkeeping ADoP but those mistakes are easy to avoid. Herald is an interesting position, I suppose, for memorializing the history of the game, so it requires its holder to award titles when something suitably historical happens. I don't think it's a wide-ranging policy role as referee is, and I don't think it's scammable. However I take your point, I do take it. I shouldn't have done it, probably. I do take your point. I know the way I take this game is less than serious, which can be at times a slap in the face to those who recognize the decades-long history of the game with a lot of weight. I don't mean to shit all over everything, and that's a tough line to navigate with the other ways that I've played this game. I've got 13 messages in the last 10 minutes. I dread them, rather. On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 11:23 AM, Kerim Aydin <ke...@u.washington.edu> wrote: > > > On Tue, 28 Nov 2017, VJ Rada wrote: > > I deputise for Herald to publish the following weekly report (unless > > PSS is the Herald). > > You should clearly know this to be false. It updates nothing. > > It is questionable whether you can call this the weekly report for the > appropriate (missing) week. > > Also: trying this is a complete fucking, fucking insult to officers > who actually, you know, work on their offices and don't just see them > as scam opportunities. Just some constructive feedback there. > > > > > > -- >From V.J. Rada
