I'm generally philosophically opposed to arbitrarily complex actions taken "by announcement".
CFJ 1774 is, I think, the strongest precedent we have here. The CFJ is clear that you can't, by default, take an action by announcement ambiguously; the use of shorthands (and, by extension, conditionals) are a convenience but not one that can be used abusively. On Sun, 26 Nov 2017 at 19:04 Corona <liliumalbum.ag...@gmail.com> wrote: > I thought about including a simple backup clause, but I ran out of time. > > On 11/26/17, Alexis Hunt <aler...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Sun, 26 Nov 2017 at 18:58 Corona <liliumalbum.ag...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > >> The following 5 paragraphs apply to all actions taken in this message, > >> other text to the contrary notwithstanding: > >> > > > > I'm willing to argue that most of this message fails due to being too > > complicated to resolve, but I'm gonna sit this one out and let others > argue > > about it. > > >
