Per rule 591, CFJs are based on the time they are called.
On Sun, 26 Nov 2017 at 13:22 ATMunn <iamingodsa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> You withdrew the proposal and contract though right? Wouldn't it be false
> then since you can't pend a proposal that doesn't exist? Or would the CFJ
> be judged from when you called it?
>
> On 11/26/2017 1:12 PM, Alexis Hunt wrote:
> > I spend a shiny to create the following contract, entitled "No
> > Self-Indulgence":
> > {{{
> > Alexis SHALL NOT pend any proposal e authored.
> > Alexis CAN revoke this contract by announcement.
> > }}}
> >
> > I submit the following proposal:
> > Proposal: Self-Indulgence AI=3
> > {{{
> > The contract "No Self-Indulgence" is destroyed.
> >
> > If, immediately after this proposal's submission, it was LEGAL for Alexis
> > to pend it, repeal Rule 101.
> > }}}
> >
> > I AP-CFJ:
> > {{{
> > It is LEGAL for me to pend the proposal "Self-Indulgence".
> > }}}
> >
> > Arguments:
> > Per Rule 2525, pending a proposal whose sole effect is to destroy a
> > contract a protected action, and therefore cannot be forbidden by a
> > contract. Thus, the restriction on pending proposals in "No
> > Self-Indulgence" does not apply to any proposal whose sole effect is to
> > destroy a contract.
> >
> > If it is LEGAL for me to pend Self-Indulgence, then it will repeal Rule
> > 101. In this case, its effect is not solely limited to destroying a
> > contract (or any of the other effects that would cause its pending to be
> > protected by Rule 2525). Thus, pending it is unprotected and No
> > Self-Indulgence is free to restrict it. So it must actually be ILLEGAL.
> >
> > If it is ILLEGAL for me to pend Self-Indulgence, then it will not repeal
> > Rule 101. In this case, its effect is solely limited to destroying a
> > contract, and pending it is protected. Thus No Self-Indulgence cannot
> > impose on me an obligation not to pend it, so it must be LEGAL (Given
> that,
> > as is in fact the case, there is nothing else that would make it
> illegal).
> >
> > I destroy No Self-Indulgence and withdraw Self-Indulgence.
> >
>
