Ahh, hmm, I think that might work provided we can get a non-player to call sufficient CFJs. Given the volume we couldn't do it with Shinies alone.
On Wed, 22 Nov 2017 at 15:34 Kerim Aydin <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > On Wed, 22 Nov 2017, Alexis Hunt wrote: > > Thus, I think the correct solution here is to have another officer issue > > illegal favours to a number of people, each of whom influences > politicians > > sufficiently such that V.J. Rada cannot become an advisor, and agrees not > > to use eir power. Then we pass a proposal absolving the officer of > > responsibility. > > If some people call a bunch of CFJs (on trivial matters), and others favor > them, and I assign them and they judge, and I award, can we get sufficient > judicial favours spread around to counteract, entirely legally? (if we > don't hit the Excess limit). > > Further if judges file Motions after judging and then re-judge, they > can be awarded twice. If then the group-file option is used with a gang > of three conspirators, three times. (I'm actually amazed no one has used > Motions to double their judicial rewards so far, but I guess the rewards > are low in normal circumstances). > > Sorry I haven't worked through the win mechanism to know if this works, I > just noticed I could award favors for CFJs. > > > >
