> On Nov 21, 2017, at 8:30 PM, ATMunn <iamingodsa...@gmail.com> wrote: > > So when publishing report revisions, even if things changed between the > original report and the revision, all that has to be changed is the thing in > the CoE?
In this case V.J pointed out the CoE close enough to the publication of the report that I corrected the error and republished it as-is. There’s no formal requirement that a revision either include or disregard subsequent actions; I’ve taken the approach of “eh, whatever’s easiest” but intend to tighten up my practice to revise the report in-place as soon as it’s practical for me to do so. However, it’s irrelevant to your claim. You claimed that the Floating Value changed between report and revision. The Floating Value did not change between those two events, because no action occurred that would change it. The Treasuror can set the FV once per week, and must set it to exactly Agora’s balance when e does so, but the FV is otherwise an independent number from Agora’s balance. That’s all that happened there: a minor rules clarity issue around whether the FV in the revision was correct or not. I very much appreciate the sanity checks! -o
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
