No, you definitely can't. Rule 1023: "A requirement to perform an action at an exact instant (e.g. "when X, Y SHALL Z"), but not "in the same message", is instead interpreted as a requirement to perform that action in a timely fashion after that instant."
-Aris On Sun, Nov 5, 2017 at 7:24 PM, Madeline <[email protected]> wrote: > Is there anything about a timely fashion in there, or can I just sit on this > until it's repealed? > > > > On 2017-11-06 14:16, Josh T wrote: > > I'm kind of surprised that it passed at all. I suppose I should go fix it so > that it does things, but given that for about six months I had an > organization that nobody could read, don't hold your breath for > clarifications or a fast resolution. > > 天火狐 > > On 5 November 2017 at 22:08, VJ Rada <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> i think it means you can either duel me or not duel me. if you don't want >> to duel me, you have to submit a nameless writ and remit, paying me (?) 10 >> shinies. if you want to duel, we duel, someone initiates an Agoran Decision >> (but hell, damned if it says who) and nothing happens to the loser. >> >> >> >> On Mon, Nov 6, 2017 at 2:00 PM, Madeline <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> I'll respond if you explain what it actually does in plain text, I'm >>> stumped on lines 3-5. >>> >>> >>> On 2017-11-06 13:58, VJ Rada wrote: >>> >>> I can't believe that proposal passed. Read what you're voting for, chaps. >>> >>> I challenge Telnaior to a poetry duel by issuing a Poetry Duel Challenge >>> Writ. >>> -- >>> From V.J. Rada >>> >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> From V.J. Rada > > >
