On Tue, 2017-11-07 at 22:41 -0500, Owen Jacobson wrote: > It’s not clear to me that the suggested ambiguity is sufficient to > render a fixed asset transferrable, though. Maybe I’m dense, but the > relevant clauses > > > Pledges are an indestructible fixed asset. > > and > > > An asset generally CAN be transferred (syn. paid, given) by > > announcement by its owner to another entity, subject to > > modification by its backing document. A fixed asset is one defined > > as such by its backing document, and CANNOT be transferred; any > > other asset is liquid. > > combine fairly clearly.
The first definition has power 1.7, so can't override the power-3 definition of "fixed asset" in your second quote. -- ais523
