On Tue, 7 Nov 2017, Owen Jacobson wrote: > > 7958* G. 2.0 Succession Planning G. OP [1] > > FOR. I like the idea, but I’m not convinced of the implementation: in > particular, is an appointed successor an interim, or a non-interim > holder of an office? I’m voting for it regardless, since it does solve > a known issue; we can work out the refinements afterwards.
It's Interim by definition in R1006: > A holder of an elected office who did not become its holder by winning > an election, and has not won an election for that office since, is an > interim holder.
