I think you should prune some of these annotations, presuming you get elected. For example, on "Holidays" (1769), you have three annotations that refer to a word that no longer appears in the rule.
Obviously putting the annotations back in is better than not, but just noting that checking them is a project we should be workin' on. On Mon, Nov 6, 2017 at 6:12 PM, Alexis Hunt <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, 6 Nov 2017 at 02:05 Alexis Hunt <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Below is my draft of the FLR. It is quite long, naturally. I've done >> my best to keep everything inside 72 columns and format all >> annotations available, in addition to my previous notes. Pay >> particular attention to the formatting in the history and annotations >> please; it doesn't match historical rulesets and I'm interested in >> your feedback! I'm also undecided on the date format, if you have >> other thoughts, let me know. > > > One other note: the resolutions from today are not included, because I did > not have the time to put them in while working on the formatter. > -- >From V.J. Rada
