On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 11:27 PM, Alexis Hunt <aler...@gmail.com> wrote: > In my work on the rules history, I discovered that around 1999, it was > possible to adopt proposals outside the normal distribution process, and > this led to two proposals being adopted without classic ID numbers: one with > ID number "01-003" and another without an ID number at all. Probably more > were as well, but these are the only two in the modern ruleset's history. > > Do you think you could skip two ID numbers so that we could assign these > regular ID numbers by proposal? If anyone has better ideas, especially for > the one that never got an ID number and is only identified by name, I'm > interested. I mostly want to clean this up for cleanliness but I guess it > isn't the end of the world if we leaves things as is; it just makes it > harder to keep track of them historically.
7957-7958 will work (I'll try not to forget). Isn't this the kind of situation where ratification without objection is appropriate? -Aris
