> On Oct 25, 2017, at 10:41 AM, Kerim Aydin <ke...@u.washington.edu> wrote: > > > > On Wed, 25 Oct 2017, Owen Jacobson wrote: >> On Oct 25, 2017, at 12:30 AM, Owen Jacobson <o...@grimoire.ca> wrote: >> >>> I cause Agora to make the following payments, which I believe can be >>> uniquely decomposed into the individual payments required by “Passive >>> Income”: >>> >>> * 8 sh. to ProofTechnique >>> * 8 sh. to ais523 >>> * 4 sh. to G. > > Um --- > > There's nothing to suggest ais523's join-by-ratification worked, > given past CFJ 3456 found quite clearly that it doesn't without eir > explicit at-the-time consent....? Or did I misunderstand the > sequence of events.
I based the attempt to distribute basic income on the contents of the Oct 22 Registrar’s report, which listed ais523. If ais523 is, in fact, not a player, then neither the original distribution nor the “fixed” distribution succeeded - but they failed for different reasons, and the latter may have _partially_ succeeded. Joy! -o
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
