Is this intended to influence the destroying-the-universe CFJ? This is
literally exactly the thing the arguments there were talking about.
On 2017-10-26 12:45, ATMunn wrote:
For fun, I create the below proposal:
Title: Way More Controversial Version of the Above
Author: ATMunn
Co-Author(s): Telnaior, V.J. Rada
Deregister all currently registered players.
On 10/25/2017 9:38 PM, VJ Rada wrote:
On the same note I create the below proposal and pend it with AP
Title: More Controversial Version of the Above
Co- Author:Telnaior
AI: 3
Text: Deregister Murphy and omd.
On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 12:04 PM, Telnaior <j...@iinet.net.au
<mailto:j...@iinet.net.au>> wrote:
I create the following proposal and use an Action Point to flip
its Imminence switch to pending:
Title: More Actions Should Use Agoran Consent
Author: Telnaior
AI: 3
{
Flip the Citizenship switch of Ienpw III to Unregistered.
Flip the Citizenship switch of Bayushi to Unregistered.
Flip the Citizenship switch of ProofTechnique to Unregistered.
}
While I'm here, related things I've found that are on my mind:
1. Rule 649 "Patent Titles" requests stronger consent for
awarding a patent title than the action itself is secured with
2. Flipping Officeholder switches isn't secured anywhere
(And yes, this proposal is more to prove a point than anything
else, though I would appreciate it if it actually passed)
--
From V.J. Rada
