Did it? OK, fair enough. We should probably just repeal Agronomy? It's a really complicated modification of five things that creates so many empty reports that the reportor forgot to publish them until last week. And the person whose idea it was left immediately after coming up with it.
On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 10:37 AM, Alexis Hunt <aler...@gmail.com> wrote: > Contracts passed, and was enacted unless my CFJ turns out true (G., any > likelihood of expediting that one and possibly linking it with my previous > one about the Promotor's report?) > > On Sun, 22 Oct 2017 at 19:36 VJ Rada <vijar...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Superintendent still exists and Secretary does pending Contracts >> actually passing, of course. >> >> On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 10:34 AM, Alexis Hunt <aler...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > On Sun, 22 Oct 2017 at 19:32 Kerim Aydin <ke...@u.washington.edu> wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> The regkeepor should be monthly not weekly - if you want a sinecure >> >> it's that - a completely empty weekly report for the last two months. >> >> >> >> We just repealed organizations, right? So that's the Secretary gone. >> > >> > >> > Superintendent is gone now, Secretary is renamed Treasuror but Notary is >> > created, so there's no total net change. >> >> >> >> >> >> I thought for a while that the Herald and Tailor should be merged, but >> >> now with Karma I wouldn't want to take on Tailor too. >> >> >> >> I think the Surveyor can be merged with the Superintendent perhaps. >> > >> > >> > I think you mean the Agronomist? I agree those don't need to be the same >> > person. They could probably be both merged with Treasuror at this point. >> > >> > (Aside: we should return to variable office salaries; currently >> > compensation >> > does not match difficulty at all) >> > >> > -Alexis >> >> >> >> -- >> From V.J. Rada -- >From V.J. Rada
