Hm, I'm not sure if the rules specifically say that the Assessor has to do that. If they did, I would CoE it, but they only say "its holder is responsible for collecting votes and keeping track of related properties."
On Sun, Oct 22, 2017 at 8:35 AM, Madeline <j...@iinet.net.au> wrote: > You missed Contracts v8 in this list of passed proposals D: > > > On 2017-10-22 23:31, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote: > >> I resolve the decision(s) to adopt proposal(s) 7923-7929 below. >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> >> [This notice resolves the Agoran decisions of whether to adopt the >> following proposals. For each decision, the options available to >> Agora are ADOPTED (*), REJECTED (x), and FAILED QUORUM (!). If a >> decision's voting period is still ongoing, I end it immediately >> before resolving it and after resolving the previous decision.] >> >> ID Author(s) AI Title Pender Pend >> fee >> ------------------------------------------------------------ >> --------------- >> 7923x Gaelan 1.0 Another Economy Fix Attempt Gaelan 1 AP >> 7924* Aris, [1] 3.0 Contracts v8 Aris 1 sh. >> 7925* Aris, Alexis 3.0 Safety Regulations v2 Aris 1 AP >> 7926x Alexis 3.0 Deregulation Alexis 1 AP >> 7927* V.J. Rada, G. 2.0 Estate Auction Fix V.J. Rada 1 sh. >> 7928* G. 3.0 no we can't G. 1 AP >> 7929x V.J. Rada 1.0 Consumerism V.J. Rada 1 sh. >> >> >> >> >> The full text of each adopted proposal is included below. >> >> >> | | 7923 | 7924 | 7025 | 7926 | 7927 | 7928 | 7929 | >> |--------+------+------+------+------+------+------+------+ >> |Alexis | A | P | F | F | F | F | P | >> |Aris | A | F | F | A | F | F | A | >> |ATMunn | A | F | F | A | F | F | A | >> |G | A | F | F | F | F | F | A | >> |nichdel | A | F | P | P | F | F | P | >> |PSS | A | F | F | A | F | F | F | >> |Trigon | F | F | P | P | P | P | A | >> |VJ Rada | F | F | F | F | F | F | F | >> |--------+------+------+------+------+------+------+------+ >> |F/A | 2/6 | 7/0 | 6/0 | 3/3 | 7/0 | 7/0 | 2/4 | >> |AI | 1.0 | 3.0 | 3.0 | 3.0 | 2.0 | 3.0 | 1.0 | >> |V | 8 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 8 | >> |Q | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | >> |P | F | T | T | F | T | T | F | >> >> >> ////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// >> ID: 7825 >> Title: Safety Regulations v2 >> Adoption index: 3.0 >> Author: Aris >> Co-author(s): Alexis >> >> >> Amend Rule 2493, "Regulations", by >> >> * Replacing every instance of the word "instrument" with the words >> "textual >> entity"; and >> * Amending the second paragraph to read in full "A regulation must be >> authorized by at least one rule in order for it to exist. A >> regulation has >> effect on the game (only) insofar as the rule or rules that >> authorized it >> permit it to have effect. If reasonably possible, a regulation >> should be >> interpreted so as to defer to other rules. The procedure for >> resolving >> conflict between regulations is the same as it is for rules (for the >> purposes of resolving conflicts only, a regulation is treated as if >> it >> had the power of its least powerful parent rule)." >> ////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// >> ID: 7827 >> Title: Estate Auction Fix >> Adoption index: 2.0 >> Author: V.J. Rada >> Co-author(s): G. >> >> >> Amend rule 2491 by replacing the text "transfer the auctioned >> Estate to the winner by announcement, by paying Agora the amount of >> the bid, or by causing the winning Organization" with "transfer the >> auctioned Estate to the winner by announcement and by either paying >> Agora the amount of the bid or causing the winning Organization" >> >> ////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// >> ID: 7828 >> Title: no we can't >> Adoption index: 3.0 >> Author: G. >> Co-author(s): >> >> >> Amend Rule 2125 (Regulated Actions) by replacing: >> >> Restricted Actions CAN only be performed as described by the Rules. >> >> with: >> A Restricted Action CAN only be performed as described by the Rules, >> and only >> using the methods explicitly specified in the Rules for performing the >> given >> action. >> >> [this over-arching protection means in general, "by announcement" >> is NOT implied. I just want to put this in place and absolutely >> clarify the ruleset if it passes, and we can add the MMI change later >> if desired]. >> >> ////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// >> >> >>
