On Fri, 2017-10-20 at 06:33 -0400, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote: > Yes, he had, but it seems I missed that when preparing a report, > probably when I was transitioning computers. In my next report, I > will ratify him away if he doesn't mind.
I should have CoE'd the first report with the mistake, just before the week was up, in order to neatly create a time paradox. (That said, ratification's designed to avoid any sort of time loop; I'd unambiguously end up a player, because the ratification assumes that the original report is true, i.e. no valid CoEs against it.) There's not really much reason for me to not be a player right now – the email situation's been fixed – but I'm kind-of enjoying the lack of pressure/obligations. -- ais523