You are right, sorry. Self-ratification is probably the part of the ruleset I look at least and leave alone in case it eats me. It's a bit strange.
On Sat, Oct 7, 2017 at 11:30 AM, Ørjan Johansen <oer...@nvg.ntnu.no> wrote: > On Thu, 5 Oct 2017, VJ Rada wrote: > >> Nothing prevents me from issuing a weekly report including the full >> text of agencies. I therefore pledge to do so as long as I am >> superintendent. There have been no changes to agencies this week. >> >> NOTE: The portion of this report referring to the agencies Ben Öyle >> Öneriyorum and G: Overlord of Dunce is disputed by pending CFJ and I >> do not intend it to self-ratify (see CFJ 3522). The "EDITOR's NOTE" >> also does not self-ratify. > > > On a brief search of the last posted ruleset (which is admittedly not up to > date, but it's what I keep in my home directory) I don't think there's > anything in the Superintendent's Report that self-ratifies anyway. If it > did, then your recent CFJ on the existence of BÖÖ would be trivial. > > I suppose Agencies are similar enough to rules for self-ratification to be > unsafe. > > Greetings, > Ørjan. -- >From V.J. Rada
