> On Dec 31, 2016, at 7:00 PM, Owen Jacobson <o...@grimoire.ca> wrote: > > On Oct 3, 2017, at 10:49 PM, Ørjan Johansen <oer...@nvg.ntnu.no> wrote: > >> "The Date: header of an emailed public message constitutes a self-ratifying >> claim that the message was sent at the indicated time.” > > On Oct 3, 2017, at 10:55 PM, Owen Jacobson <o...@grimoire.ca> wrote: > >> Far too powerful, given how difficult it can be for some clients to display >> anomalous Date: headers. > > For example, this message's Date: header claims that it was sent on Jan 1st, > 2017.
There’s also a message in the agora-business archive bearing Date: some time near the end of July This doesn’t appear to be a forgery, but it would be complicated to ratify such a date. -o
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
