I would like to direct you to CFJ 3551 in which you indirectly held that "I COE this for no reason" was a valid CoE.
On Wed, Oct 4, 2017 at 11:56 AM, Owen Jacobson <o...@grimoire.ca> wrote: > >> On Oct 3, 2017, at 9:16 PM, Owen Jacobson <o...@grimoire.ca> wrote: >> >> >>> On Oct 1, 2017, at 3:13 PM, Kerim Aydin <ke...@u.washington.edu> wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> On Sat, 30 Sep 2017, Alexis Hunt wrote: >>>> I CFJ (with AP): in the below-quoted message, V.J. Rada issued a claim of >>>> error. >>> >>> >>> This above CFJ statement is CFJ 3568. I assign it to o. >>> >>> >>> ======================================================================== >>> >>> Caller's Arguments (from Discussion): >>> >>> VJ's message does not explain the scope and nature of the perceived >>> error, as required by rule 2201 to make a claim of error. >>> >>> ======================================================================== >> >> I find this CFJ to be TRUE, following the caller’s arguments exactly. The >> alleged claim of error was >> >>> CoE this is bugging me. >> >> Sent in response to an attempt to collect a report award, and without any >> trivially obvious error in either the reward attempt or the report, this is >> insufficient for a claim of error. > > I file a Motion to Reconsider this judgement, and re-issue judgement as below: > > I find this CFJ to be FALSE, following the caller’s arguments exactly. The > alleged claim of error was > >> CoE this is bugging me. > > Sent in response to an attempt to collect a report award, and without any > trivially obvious error in either the reward attempt or the report, this is > insufficient for a claim of error. > > -o > -- >From V.J. Rada
