> On Sep 27, 2017, at 4:55 AM, VJ Rada <vijar...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Author: VJ
> Title: A million proposals for the price of one.
> AI: 3 probably.
> Text:
> Create and pend the following proposal
> {{Author: VJ Rada
> Title: Repeal All Cards
> AI: 3
> Text: Repeal all rules listed at the time of the proposal "a million
> proposals for the price of one" under the rule section "punishment".
> Remove from the rule titled "executive orders" the dot-point beginning
> with "Dive"}}
>
> Create and pend the following proposal
> {{Author: VJ Rada
> Title: VJ Rada Wins
> AI: 1
> Text:Upon the adoption of this proposal, VJ Rada wins the game}}If you prepare all of your proposals in advance, then I don’t see why nesting is necessary. Set the outer proposal to the AI of the highest included proposal, then catenate the clauses of the proposal (making changes to any proposal-specific clauses to scope them correctly, if necessary), and you’ve got a single giant equivalent proposal. As an added bonus, it doesn’t burn an extra adoption cycle to get there. -o
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
