On Wed, 27 Sep 2017 at 13:20 VJ Rada <vijar...@gmail.com> wrote: > " what about RWO’ing into existence a proposal with FOR votes from > everybody set to resolve tomorrow?" > > This works. AIS did it to fix the "without objection" thing. > > "Even scarier question: what happens to the gamestate if we discover > that ratification itself has no effect?" > We change the rules so it does have effect, fixing whatever loophole, > and then we ratify the old gamestate into existence.
Note that, historically, there has usually been an occasional proposal to ratify the ruleset to resolve this problem. It might be a good time for one once it's brought up to date.