On Wed, 27 Sep 2017 at 13:20 VJ Rada <vijar...@gmail.com> wrote:

> " what about RWO’ing into existence a proposal with FOR votes from
> everybody set to resolve tomorrow?"
>
> This works. AIS did it to fix the "without objection" thing.
>
> "Even scarier question: what happens to the gamestate if we discover
> that ratification itself has no effect?"
> We change the rules so it does have effect, fixing whatever loophole,
> and then we ratify the old gamestate into existence.


Note that, historically, there has usually been an occasional proposal to
ratify the ruleset to resolve this problem. It might be a good time for one
once it's brought up to date.

Reply via email to