DIS: Re: BUS: numerical switch generalization

[Gaelan Steele]

Wait, where’s the typo?

> On Sep 24, 2017, at 10:58 AM, Kerim Aydin <ke...@u.washington.edu> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> Crap:
>>     If 0 is in the specified values for a numerical switch and no
>>     default is otherwise default, 0 is the default for that switch.
>        ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> 
> I withdraw my proposal, "Numerical switches".
> 
> (I was hoping to use this to propose Karma this week, I wanted the
> concepts separate but will need to combine now to save the AP...)
> 
>