> On Sep 10, 2017, at 10:22 PM, Aris Merchant > <thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> wrote: > > There are two separate problems, with two of your different proposals: > > 1. No Telepathy. I was supposed to pend this for you, but I never did. > I also marked it as pended, because I was planning to pend it for you, > and then forgot. That's why I asked you to pay Agora the shiny. > > 2. Proletarian Revolution. The problem here was that both versions of > Proletarian Revolution had the same name (not sure if that was > intentional or not), but they both existed at the same time. That's an > unusual occurrence, and it got me rather muddled up. Actually, I > distributed a weird in between version, with the new text and the old > authors list. I'm going to have to think of a suitable way to ratify > this away, because I'd prefer not to invalidate voting. Anyhow, the > new version was never pended. You could give Agora a shiny for it if > you were planning to anyway, or I can do it given that it was my > error. You should also retract your old version (or whichever of them > is currently in the pool), for optimal cleanliness.
Actually, they had different names; one was revolution and one was rerevolution. I found it to be rather clever, but in retrospect that was way too confusing. I apologize for that mess. > > -Aris > > On Sun, Sep 10, 2017 at 8:54 PM, Gaelan Steele <gael...@icloud.com> wrote: >> I’m not entirely sure what happened, but I throw a shiny at Agora just in >> case. Would you mind clarifying which of my proposals, if any, are currently >> in the pool, pending, or being voted on? Sorry about the trouble I caused. >> >> Gaelan >> >>> On Sep 10, 2017, at 6:33 PM, Aris Merchant >>> <thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> Oops. I forgot out the old version. Can we just let it self >>> ratify-itself away? The new version seems like it can be free >>> standing. I also forgot to pend your other one before distributing, >>> could you just pay Agora a shiny? >>> >>> -Aris >>> >>> On Sun, Sep 10, 2017 at 6:31 PM, Gaelan Steele <gael...@icloud.com> wrote: >>>> I pend Proletarian Rerevolution. I’d advise everybody to vote FOR the >>>> current proposal now; the only difference is the fix to the agency scam >>>> (and a minor change about combustion tiebreaking, making ties go to poorer >>>> players instead of older ones), and I believe the current Hot Potato >>>> holder (o) is not the kind of player to try and cheat the system. The >>>> loophole will be patched next resolution when the v2 is passed. >>>> >>>> Gaelan >>
