I don't feel confident enough about the idea philosophically to add it to a proposal. The Referee's report doesn't self ratify, and this is the kind of thing you don't want to be ambiguous about, so what do you do? Make messages purporting to award a card self ratify?
-Aris On Fri, Sep 8, 2017 at 11:23 PM, VJ Rada <vijar...@gmail.com> wrote: > Can you make it IMPOSSIBLE to issue people cards for doing legal > things, not just SHALL NOT. My "cards are appealable" failed because > of a different reason but that seems uncontro. > > On Sat, Sep 9, 2017 at 4:20 PM, Aris Merchant > <thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> wrote: >> I submit the following proposal. >> >> -Aris >> >> --- >> Title: Card Reform and Expansion v2 >> Adoption index: 2.0 >> Author: Aris >> Co-author(s): ais523 >> >> Amend Rule 2426, "Cards", by appending the sentence >> >> "It is inappropriate to award a card to a non-player person unless the rule >> defining the card says otherwise." >> >> to the paragraph beginning "The types of Card are defined by the rules..." >> >> >> Amend Rule 2478, "Vigilante Justice", to read in full: >> >> A player CAN by announcement, but subject to the provisions of >> this rule, Point eir Finger at a person who plays the game, citing an >> alleged >> violation of the rules by that person. >> >> When a player Points a Finger, the investigator SHALL >> investigate the allegation and, in a timely fashion, SHALL >> conclude the investigation by: >> >> - issuing a Card to the pointed-at person by announcement whose >> reason is rooted in the allegation; >> >> - if e believes that no rules violation occurred or that it >> would be ILLEGAL to issue a Card for it, announcing the >> Finger Pointing to be Shenanigans. >> >> The Referee is by default the investigator for all Finger >> Pointing. When a Finger, other than the Arbitor's, is Pointed >> over an allegation related to the official duties or powers of >> the Referee, then the Arbitor CAN, by announcement, take over >> the investigation and thereby become the investigator. >> >> A player CANNOT point a finger more than twice per Agoran week, >> or more than once per Agoran week at the same person. >> >> Amend Rule 2479, "Official Justice", to read in full: >> >> The Referee CAN, subject to the provisions of this rule, impose >> Summary Judgment on a person who plays the game by issuing a card to em by >> announcement. >> >> The Referee CANNOT Point eir Finger or impose Summary Judgment >> more than five total times per week, or more than twice per week >> at or on the same person. >> >> As part of the Referee's weekly duties, e SHALL either impose >> Summary Judgment on a person or truthfully announce that e >> believes that there are no rules violations in the preceding >> Agoran week for which a Card has not already been issued. >> >> >> Amend Rule 2474, "Green Cards", to read in full: >> >> A Green Card is a type of Card that is appropriate for minor, accidental, >> and/or inconsequential infraction. A Green Card is also appropriate for any >> infraction for which no other type of Card is appropriate. It appropriate >> to >> issue a Green Card to a non-player person who plays the game, for the >> infractions previously described. When a person is issued a Green Card, e >> is ENCOURAGED to travel to the United States. >> >> >> Create a power 2.0 rule entitled "Blue Cards", with the following text: >> >> A Blue Card is a type of Card that is appropriate for deliberate or >> negligent >> infractions either where the the player responsible profited from violating >> the rules or where e significantly harmed another person or the game >> as a whole. The person issuing a Blue Card must, in the same message, >> announce a penalty between 1 shiny and the greater of 25 shinies and the >> amount the bad sport profited from the infraction, in order for the card to >> be effective. E CAN additionally, in the same message, determine the >> distribution of the money between Agora and the players(s) harmed, save >> that e CANNOT distribute money to emself or such that it would be under >> eir effective control. By default, all the money goes to Agora. >> >> When a Blue Card is issued, as a penalty, within the next 7 days, any >> player >> CAN once, with 2 Support, Levy a Fine upon the bad sport. After the Fine is >> Levied upon the bad sport, e SHALL endeavor in good faith to pay the fine >> to Agora or the correct player(s), in accordance with the distribution laid >> out by the carder. Any player CAN also act on the bad sport's behalf to do >> so, >> fulfilling eir obligation. >> >> Create a power 2.0 rule entitled "Black Cards", with the following text: >> >> A Black Card is a card appropriate for a person who plays the game, not >> currently a player, who either broke the rules while not a player or >> broke them while a player and then deregistered in bad faith. A Black >> Card CANNOT be issued to current players, and no more than 3 Black Cards >> CAN be issued per week. Any attempt to issue a Black Card in violation >> of these limitations is INEFFECTIVE. >> >> When a Black Card is issued, as a penalty, within the next 7 days, any >> player >> CAN once, with Agoran Consent, Slam the Door at the bad sport. After the >> Door >> is Slammed at a person, e CANNOT not register or take any game actions for >> 30 days, rules to the contrary notwithstanding. Any attempt to Slam the >> Door >> on a player or a person whose most recent deregistration took place without >> eir consent is INEFFECTIVE, rules to the contrary notwithstanding. > > > > -- > From V.J Rada
