I agree all of these should be fixed and made more explicit. Please see below 
for more details.
----
Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com



> On Sep 8, 2017, at 8:49 PM, Ørjan Johansen <oer...@nvg.ntnu.no> wrote:
> 
> On Fri, 8 Sep 2017, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> 
>> I transfer to Agora the Stamp Value, in shinies, to create a Stamp.
>> 
>> I know this is very likely impossible, I'm not trying to mislead anyone.
>> 
>> But if we ratify everything to what would-have-been, I want my cheap stamp.
> 
> I'll just note that the currently awaiting Ratification Without Objection 
> won't help you here, since it only affects past holdings and doesn't fix the 
> MAY issue itself.
> 
> Also, I searched for may/MAY in the last posted Ruleset.  I found only one 
> "MAY" people seem still to have missed, but there are a lot of cases where 
> "may" is used in a way that would break if it were synonymous with "MAY" 
> rather than "CAN".
> 
> Rule 478 may not enable changing Forum publicity.

This is resolved because of ratification of the reports, within which it is 
included.

> 
> Rule 2493 may not enable enacting/modifying regulations.

This is resolved because of ratification of the reports, within which it is 
included.

> 
> Rule 2500 may not prevent someone going negative AP.

This could be a problem.

> 
> Rule 2431 may not prevent more than one simultaneous competition. (Unclear 
> since it's not really about actions.)

This isn’t very important

> 
> Rule 208 and 955 should probably use "can" instead of "may", in principle.
> 
> Rule 991 may not enable barring from judgement.

This can be resolved by the Arbitor following the requested earrings.

> 
> Rule 2492 feels like it's probably okay, but still probably should use "CAN".
> 
> Rule 2467 may not enable creating Agencies - that's a "MAY", so I'm a bit 
> surprised no one seems to have picked up on this. If "may"s are a problem, 
> amendment, revocation and use is also impossible.

This is resolved because of ratification of the reports, within which it is 
included.

> 
> Rule 2464 may not enable repealing tournament regulations.

This is resolved because of ratification of the reports, within which it is 
included.

> 
> Rule 2491 may not allow bidding on auctions. (Depends on whether a bid is 
> just an announcement.)

This has previously been resolved by ratification, but could still become an 
issue in the future.

> 
> Rule 2483 makes me queasy. Can I own Shinies, even if I may not?
> 
> Rule 2485 may not enable heir flipping.
> 
> Rule 2480 may not enable flipping Festivity.

This is an urgent change, given the nature of the rule.

> 
> Rule 2495 should probably use "can" instead of "may".
> 
> Greetings,
> Ørjan.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail

Reply via email to