I dont like the taste of it at all but oh well. On Fri, Sep 8, 2017 at 5:20 AM, Aris Merchant < thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> You couldn't be carded. Speaking for myself though, I would > disapprove. Ratification seems like the best way out of this mess. > > -Aris > > On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 8:18 PM, Cuddle Beam <cuddleb...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Proto-actions: > > > > I object to the latest Stamps Addendum and the latest weekly Secretary’s > > report on grounds that their author has included information which is > > inaccurate. > > > > I Point a Finger to myself for harming gameplay interests via the > objection > > above. > > > > ---- > > > > Would I be carded? Is disagreeing to including false information like > this > > (for the greater good of the flow of gameplay) "bad"? > > > > On Fri, Sep 8, 2017 at 5:13 AM, VJ Rada <vijar...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > >> Sure but it can also be used to fix things everyone agrees is wrong. > >> If you want to object to o.'s reports I guess, do so. We'll figure it > >> out some way. > >> > >> On Fri, Sep 8, 2017 at 1:12 PM, Cuddle Beam <cuddleb...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> > Really? I thought it was to "anchor" the gamestate in case of dispute > or > >> > ambiguity so that the game can continue, but here there really isnt > one. > >> > > >> > On Fri, Sep 8, 2017 at 5:09 AM, VJ Rada <vijar...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> > >> >> i mean, that's why ratification exists. > >> >> > >> >> On Fri, Sep 8, 2017 at 1:08 PM, Cuddle Beam <cuddleb...@gmail.com> > >> >> wrote: > >> >> > Knowingly including inaccurate information doesn't feel right to > me. > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > On Fri, Sep 8, 2017 at 4:53 AM, Owen Jacobson <o...@grimoire.ca> > >> >> > wrote: > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > On Sep 7, 2017, at 10:47 PM, VJ Rada <vijar...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > Let's just ratify everyone who we thought had stamps into having > >> >> >> > them. > >> >> >> > >> >> >> Not objecting to my last Stamps Addendum or my last weekly > >> >> >> Secretary’s > >> >> >> report will do that, thankfully. > >> >> >> > >> >> >> -o > >> >> >> > >> >> > > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> -- > >> >> From V.J Rada > >> > > >> > > >> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> From V.J Rada > > > > >
