On Mon, 4 Sep 2017, Aris Merchant wrote: > I submit the following proposal. I don't think anything in it should > be objectionable, but let me know if that isn't true. I seem to recall > someone mentioning that R101 probably didn't need to be at power 4, > but it's nice symbolism and I don't remember any specific problems. > > --- > Title: Agora Protection Act > Adoption index: 3.0 > Author: Aris > Co-author(s): > > Amend Rule 1698 by: > Replacing the words "any other single change" with "any other single change or > inseparable group of changes". > > Change the power of Rule 1698 to 4.0. > > Change the power of Rule 101 to 4.0.
My personal opinion is that anything actually functional should be at a level to allow something higher if we decide. Eg use 3.9, then if we need something higher 3.99 and so on, but leaving 4 as an asymptote or for non-functional trophies.
