On Sat, 2017-08-26 at 09:54 -0700, Gaelan Steele wrote: > Here’s the assessor text in question: http://www.mail-archive.com/ago > ra-offic...@agoranomic.org/msg08096.html <http://www.mail- > archive.com/agora-offic...@agoranomic.org/msg08096.html>. The > bracketed text is in the indented section containing the rule; I’m > not sure if that counts as ambiguous.
In that case, I'd expect the text to end up in the rule (although based on what it says, I don't think it has any gameplay effect). We don't have any rule that rules need to make sense (and in fact have enacted intentionally nonsensical rules in the past). -- ais523
