On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 7:58 PM, Alex Smith <ais...@alumni.bham.ac.uk> wrote: > On Thu, 2017-08-24 at 02:54 +0000, Aris Merchant wrote: >> On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 7:53 PM Owen Jacobson <o...@grimoire.ca> >> wrote: >> >> > >> > > On Aug 23, 2017, at 10:52 PM, V.J Rada <vijar...@gmail.com> >> > > wrote: >> > > >> > > I intend to moot the judgment in 3537 with two support. >> > >> > I support. >> > >> > -o >> > >> > I support and do so. >> >> -Aris > > Something seems to be wrong with your email client's quoting style; > your "I support and do so" was written as though it were a quote of o. > Does that work? At any rate, it'd be nice to make it unambiguous > whether the CFJ has been mooted, given all the other stuff that's been > going on with it…
The moot failed anyway, so it doesn't really matter. > Also, it's fairly surprising that there's no time limit on mooting > CFJs. I actually think this is very reasonable. It provides a way of overturning precedents we don't like without a special proposal and without the Rule 217 precedent factor weighing against the argument to overturn. -Aris
