On Thu, 2017-08-17 at 02:03 -0400, Owen Jacobson wrote: > On Aug 1, 2017, at 8:21 AM, Alex Smith <ais...@alumni.bham.ac.uk> > wrote: > > > > I spend an action point, if it is possible for me to do so, to > > > call > > > for judgement on the following statement: > > > > > > Nichdel has 1 Stamp (nichdel) and 9 Shinies. > > > > This is CFJ 3550 and was paid for using AP. I assign it to Quazie. > > If it is possible for me to do so, I withdraw this CFJ.
It only appears to be possible if the CFJ has never had a judge. We might want to change that. I can just let the CFJ languish in the oblivion of CFJs that nobody cares about if necessary, until the rules are changed? -- ais523
