See my other response for why I believe this is invalid and ineffective, but thankfully not needed. ---- Publius Scribonius Scholasticus p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com
> On Aug 3, 2017, at 4:20 PM, Alex Smith <ais...@alumni.bham.ac.uk> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2017-08-03 at 21:15 +0100, Alex Smith wrote:
>> I intend, without objection, to ratify the following document. (Note:
>> this document is invalid because it describes a sequence of events that
>> never actually happened, and the reason for ratifying it is to close a
>> potential dictatorship.)
> By "invalid", I meant "inaccurate". If for some reason (e.g. disclaimer
> precedents) that invalidates the actions in the message, I repeat them,
> but with "invalid" corrected to "inaccurate".
>
>> {{{{
>> There exists a pending proposal with ID number "7868b", title "Scam
>> Fix", AI 3, and the following text:
>> {{{
>> In rule 1728, change all occurrences of "With N Objections" to "Without
>> N Objections".
>>
>> Cause nichdel to become the Assessor.
>> }}}
>>
>> ais523 is the Assessor.
>>
>> There is an Agoran Decision on whether to adopt that proposal whose AI
>> is 3, whose voting period has ended, whose vote collector is the
>> Assessor, and whose quorum is 1. ais523 cast a valid ballot voting FOR
>> it; no other players voted on it.
>> }}}}
>>
>> Without objection, I do so.
>>
>> I hereby resolve the Agoran Decision on whether to adopt proposal
>> 7868b. The valid ballots were as follows:
>>
>> ais523: FOR
>>
>> There was a total of 1 valid ballot, with 1 ballot cast FOR and 0
>> ballots cast AGAINST. The outcome was ADOPTED.
>>
>> The text of the adopted proposal was:
>> {{{
>> In rule 1728, change all occurrences of "With N Objections" to "Without
>> N Objections".
>>
>> Cause nichdel to become the Assessor.
>> }}}
>
> --
> ais523
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
