> On Aug 1, 2017, at 1:17 AM, Aris Merchant > <thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I think there's a scamable hole in the rule "Rewards". It says that the > reward for "Publishing a duty-fulfilling report" is "5 shinies". If you CoE > your own report, then it's your duty to revise it. The revision is also a > report, and it is at that point your duty to publish it. This allows you > steal all of Agora's shinies by CoEing your own report, accepting, and > publishing revisions indefinitely many times. If people think this merits a > CFJ, I'm happy to call one, but I'd like others to sanity check it first, and > I don't have time to write a whole CFJ up right now. It is my opinion that it > would be rude for anyone else to use this hole, as I could have just stolen > them all myself and then given them back when we fixed the bug. > > Sorry for the rushed semi-coherent email, > -Aris
As this is not a CFJ, the following is not a gratuitous argument: We have recently developed a trend of treating only the final revision as a “duty-fulfilling report” when a series of revisions are CoE’d. This shows up in, for example, the recently-repealed Payday, where I had paid people only once even for reports which received multiple revisions and nobody complained. That’s probably worth codifying or passing through judgement, but I’m out of AP and I need to keep my Shinies to pay the auction winner with. -o
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
