On Fri, 2017-07-28 at 22:29 -0400, Owen Jacobson wrote: > It is no longer possible for me to impose summary judgement on > Cuddlebeam, as e is presently not a player. I actually do have a good > argument for why a card would be appropriate, but it’s irrelevant, as > carding Cuddlebeam now would not be possible under r. 2479 (“Official > Justice”). Accordingly, the only option before me is to find this > finger-pointing to be Shenanigans.
You could nonetheless make the argument for the benefit of the Herald's Fugitives list, which is entirely unofficial. (I'm not 100% sure it would even apply in this situation, but it sort-of fits.) -- ais523
