On Sun, 2017-07-23 at 17:46 -0700, Aris Merchant wrote: > On Sat, Jul 22, 2017 at 12:41 PM, Aris Merchant > <thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I hereby distribute each listed proposal, initiating the Agoran > > Decision of whether to adopt it, and removing it from the proposal > > pool. For this decision, the vote collector is the Assessor, the > > quorum is 3.0 and the valid options are FOR and AGAINST (PRESENT is > > also a valid vote). > > Administrative note: due to the past amending properties of self > ratification, I believe the quorum of these decisions is now 2.0. > Honorable assessor, you may want to familiarize yourself with the new > quorum rules. I believe your assessment of Proposal 7866 was > technically incorrect, as the decision had a quorum of 5.0. I didn't > complain because the lack of votes was a result of my incorrect > distribution, and the whole mess was thus really my fault. :)
IIRC, quorum doesn't self-ratify. (See rule 879.) Voting results, on the other hand, do self-ratify, but the gamestate change created by the self-ratification is to apply the results of the proposal, not to change the reason why it passed/failed. -- ais523
