You when by bein issued trust tokens _by_ players, so I don't think it matters who tge token is supposedly originally from. Even if you successfully issued a Murphy trust token to me, it was still issued by you and not Murphy.
On Jul 20, 2017 08:07, "Cuddle Beam" <cuddleb...@gmail.com> wrote: > This isn't consequential to other actions/offices, it's just related to > Trust Tokens which people have been hardly using lately anyway. Here, I > attempt to grant Trust Tokens via that "a Trust Token" means any kind of > Trust Token, much how "a banana" can be a rotten banana, my banana, your > banana, a ripe banana, etc. > > Note that this treads into fairly abstract territory due to how open "a X" > can be via the banana reasoning. > > > --------*------ > > Note R2452: "Any player can issue a Trust Token to another person by > announcement." > > Be a TrustToken[A, B] a Trust Token such that player A would issue to > player B if A posted a message of "I grant a Trust Token to B", where B is > Player B's name, to a-b; > > Once, for each player except Murphy, I issue a Trust Token[A, B] to > Murphy, where A is that player and B is Murphy, to Murphy. > > Then, I do the same, again, but for the beneficiary to be another player > instead of Murphy (for example, "Once, for each player except Ais523, I > issue a Trust Token[A, B] to Ais523, where A is that player and B > is Ais523, to Ais523."), until I have done the sequence for all Players > (except myself, because I can't issue myself Trust Tokens). > > I CFJ: "All Players except Cuddlebeam now have enough Trust Tokens to win > the game." > > I then informally plead for anyone to send me Trust Tokens via this > technique as well, so that I can claim victory too. >
