On Mon, 17 Jul 2017, Ørjan Johansen wrote: > On Mon, 17 Jul 2017, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote: > > > It wasn’t needed, but I think it would have worked. > > Well my thought was that if it was needed, then the time limit to resolve the > proposal could not have expired, and so the deputisation would not be valid.
Issuing a Humiliating Public Reminder is a SHALL timed with the moment of voting period being extended, so someone could deputize to do that reminder (but pretty sure that boilerplate doesn't do the trick).
