I express interest in this one.
On Sun, Jul 9, 2017 at 9:56 AM, CuddleBeam <cuddleb...@googlemail.com>
wrote:
> I could proto-CFJ this but I feel like its good enough to merit a normal
> CFJ.
>
> I CFJ: "No rule other than rule 2166 can be a backing document."
>
> Arguments:
> - CFJ 3532 ("Assets with multiple backing documents can't exist")
> - R2166 states "An asset is an entity defined as such by a rule", however,
> this is in itself a definition of what an asset is - it is an entity
> defined as such by a rule. So R2166 is a backing document.
> - Given that "Assets with multiple backing docs can't exist", and R2166
> itself is a backing document (applicable to *all* assets), no other backing
> document can exist in the ruleset.
>
