R2160: "(...) 3. Either (i) the office is vacant; or (ii) the aforementioned time limit expired more than fourteen days ago; or (iii) the deputy announced between two and fourteen days earlier that e intended to deputise for that office for the purposes of the particular action."
"(iii) the deputy announced between two and fourteen days earlier that e intended to deputise for that office for the purposes of the particular action." <- Not this. "(ii) the aforementioned time limit expired more than fourteen days ago" <- This. On Thu, Jul 6, 2017 at 3:53 PM, Nicholas Evans <nich...@gmail.com> wrote: > You never depitized. You have to announce intent to depitize for occupied > offices. > > On Jul 6, 2017 06:11, "Cuddle Beam" <cuddleb...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> This is a bit of a mess I've caused to him really, lol. I'll help tidy it >> up a bit so that things are more clear: >> >> Gratuitous argument for that CFJ: >> >> There has been a bit of tumbling, but with people's input, the most >> recent version of my scam goes like this: >> >> ▪ In R2491 we have: "At the start of each month, if Agora owns at least >> one Estate, the Surveyor shall put one Estate which is owned by Agora up >> for auction, by announcement. Each auction ends seven days after it >> begins.". During the "Start of the Month", even if the Surveyor puts just >> the first Estate up to Auction, "if Agora owns at least one Estate" is >> still true. There are still Estates in Agora's ownership even after the >> Surveyor put the first one up to auction. Ergo, it would be required to put >> up yet another Estate. And another, and another, until there are no more >> Estates, during the time it was his duty to do so. This is the obligation I >> deputized for, from *last month's* auctions - The June Auctions - because >> it has "expired more than fourteen days ago". >> >> ▪ I did the deputization and auctions here: http://www.mail-archive. >> com/agora-busin...@agoranomic.org/msg28798.html >> >> ▪ This is my conjecture, but I believe that he has lost the office and >> that I have it now (hence his doubts, I suspect, please let me know if I'm >> wrong and its something else), via R2160: "When a player deputises via >> normal deputisation for an elected office, e becomes the holder of that >> office.". I deputized for the office of Surveyor, so I've now become the >> Surveyor. >> >> >> >> >> On Thu, Jul 6, 2017 at 12:46 PM, Alex Smith <ais...@alumni.bham.ac.uk> >> wrote: >> >>> On Thu, 2017-07-06 at 01:57 -0400, Owen Jacobson wrote: >>> > I CFJ on the statement “I am the Surveyor.” >>> >>> This is likely to be dismissed due to lack of context. What's the >>> controversy that might affect whether or not you're the Surveyor? >>> >>> -- >>> ais523 >>> >> >>
