> On Jun 19, 2017, at 1:32 AM, Kerim Aydin <ke...@u.washington.edu> wrote: > > > > On Mon, 19 Jun 2017, Owen Jacobson wrote: >> Title: This Isn't Even A Scam >> Author: o >> Adoption Index: 0.1 > > Are you meaning to get this passed with fewer For votes than Against > votes? Because you need at least a F/A > 1 regardless of AI (R955): > > The outcome is ADOPTED if F/A >= AI and F/A > > 1 (or F>0 and A=0), otherwise REJECTED. > > (If that's not the trick here, my apologies).
Ah, damn, no, that is the trick. I’d misunderstood. That does seem to make AI < 1.0 somewhat less useful than I’d thought, though. -o
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
