1 - Current rules are certainly not handled by 10 year old CFJs... BUT 2 - A non-player interacting with the game can't be compelled to act, but if they do act they are wilfully agreeing and can be bound by the rules - meaning they can't just do illegal things and have them succeed, as they are `playing the game` and thus must abide by the rules.
On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 10:15 AM CuddleBeam <cuddleb...@googlemail.com> wrote: > We have: [CFJ 1709 (called 26 July 2007): The rules are binding on all those > who play the game in the broader sense, regardless of whether they > have the rule-defined status of "player".] > > > And then in R869: "The Rules CANNOT otherwise bind a person to abide by any > agreement without that person's willful consent." and "The Rules CANNOT > compel non-players to act(...)" > > So, if you're a person who is "playing" the game (for example, puppeteering > someone via their agency), but who isn't a Player and you don't give a damn > about the rules, are you bound to the rules as per CJ1709 or are you not as > per R869? > >
