On Mon, 12 Jun 2017, CuddleBeam wrote:
> I retracted it, sorry. I looked through the CFJ history and couldn't find 
> anything relevant (maybe I didn't search for the right thing though) but 
> I'm glad to know that its alright.

There's not one *combining* nicknames and capitalization that I can
remember, but cases like this:
   https://faculty.washington.edu/kerim/nomic/cases/?1361

say we can be flexible about nicknames as long as it's clear who's being
discussed (and we can do it without adding "officially" to the Registrar
tracking multiple nicknames).

Further, the following used to be Rule text, and is generally still 
the guideline for interpretation of capital letters (I can't think of a
capitalization-specific CFJ that's happened since this text was removed;
this may be another 'text-to-put-back' if it's useful to be explicit):

       (1) A difference in spelling, grammar, capitalization, or
           dialect, or the use of a synonym or abbreviation in place of
           a word or phrase is inconsequential in all forms of
           communication, as long as the difference does not create an
           ambiguity in meaning, except for the purpose of reporting on
           or quoting the text of a legal document.




Reply via email to