One comment: there's a lot of energy in Agencies right now. Agencies are useful to let people do things on behalf of other people.
But that's all pretty meaningless if there's nothing for people to actually *do*. Get *something* in there (other than proposals) that's worth spending money on. Maybe territory, maybe academia, maybe winning points - but I think just "fixing" isn't quite on, because there's not much underlying gameplay to actually *fix*. By "underlying gameplay" I mean something grindy (to a certain degree), something where players make a few, basic moves regularly to build up to an interesting game position. Also, now that we've given each other feedback on CFJs, it might be nice to see if this CFJ storm is mostly over and was just passing through, before jumping to create more complicated systems that assume 20 CFJs/week is the new normal... On Tue, 30 May 2017, Quazie wrote: > I Object - I think a proposal competition around making things less messy > might be more important at > the moment vs adding a bunch of new academic stuff (I like the general idea, > but it might not be the > perfect time) > > On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 4:19 AM CuddleBeam <cuddleb...@googlemail.com> wrote: > > I SUPPORT this. > > ...If it's alright that there has been a typo there and the following got > split: > > "Objective of improving and encouraging scholarship of Agora and/or theming > Agora around scholarship and academia." > > >
