I'll add it to my long list of things to do. I might get around to a better writeup of the Agency rule today, if not, then tomorrow.
On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 11:52 AM Aris Merchant < thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> wrote: > I don't care if it's actually a problem or just appears to be one, we > need to fix this. Care to write up a proposal Quazie? > > -Aris > > On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 11:27 AM, Josh T <draconicdarkn...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > If this is the case, I have no problem supporting such a proposal. > > > > 天火狐 > > > > On 30 May 2017 at 14:26, Quazie <quazieno...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > >> So grok left, and that's a bummer, but it's especially a bummer for me, > >> the Superintendent - I think his agency still exists... there's nothing > in > >> the rule about Agencies that suggests it goes away, but I think the > agency > >> is fully neutered, as agencies only allow you to act on behalf of a > player. > >> > >> Also - this likely means that PSS's agency to allow anyone to > re-register > >> em will never be effective. > >> > >> Let's not CFJ unless we need to, but I think we need to modify the > Agency > >> rule to allow the destruction of non-player Agencies at the least (or > they > >> will live `forever`) > > > > >
